The French Ministry for Ecology, Sustainable Development and Energy has opened a public consultation on EDCs, following a report delivered by an ad hoc working group.
The report (available here in French) proposes intensifying research efforts, with a focus on the effects of EDCs on health and biodiversity and on possible replacement options. It also calls for at least five substances each year that are assessed on their endocrine disrupting effects.
The consultation (FR) is open until 20 September and the results will feed into a national strategy on EDCs prepared by the French government.
The European Chemicals Agency (ECHA) has recently opened an eight week period for public consultation on alternatives on the use of a phthalate (DEHP), a suspected carcinogen, known reprotoxicant, EDC and neurotoxicant. The consultation closes on 9 October 2013.
Interested parties are invited to submit relevant information on alternatives for the use of a substance subject to authorisation. The comments will be posted on ECHA’s website on a regular basis,.
All the submissions will be reviewed and considered by the ECHA Committees for Risk Assessment (RAC) and Socio-economic Analysis (SEAC). Based on the final opinions of the two committees, the European Commission will take a decision as to whether to grant the applicant an authorisation for the use applied for, or not.
Further information on the public consultation and on how to submit information on alternatives can be found at:
Information on the ongoing public consultations and the consultation process for applications for authorisation
More information on the applications for authorisation process under the REACH Regulation
Post provided by campaign secretariat HEAL
On 24 July 2013, campaign partner BUND launched an App to make it easier for consumers to check if their cosmetics contain EDCs.
The Smart phone App is based on a study that BUND carried out using the data-bank of the Swiss Code-Check.info-platform http://www.codecheck.info/ which at that time comprised the lists of ingredients of 62.559 cosmetic products. The code-check database is being continually compiled by critical consumers in German-speaking countries in a Wikipedia style system.
BUND screened the Code-Check data for 16 EDCs that emerged as critical for consumers’ health after cross-checking the EU-priority list for EDCs with the INCI-List (International Nomenclature of Cosmetic Ingredients).
The most striking results are that nearly a third of the 62.559 products contain EDCs. But there are EDC-Free alternatives out there on the market for example, shampoo and toothpaste. Natural cosmetics are generally EDC-Free whereas market leaders use the harmful substances in nearly half of their body care products.
Simple steps to using the ToxFox-App:
- The bar-code of a product is scanned by the camera of the iPhone, then a green or a red symbol tells whether the product is EDC-Free or not.
- A blue question mark appears when new products are scanned
- The App can also select data along product groups and companies.
Those without an iPhone or Smart phone can use the tool via BUND’s website here www.bund.net/toxfox. Before ending the search, individuals can send an email to the respective producer asking about the product.
The idea behind the tool is to provide consumers with the opportunity to protect their health and that of their children as long as legislative regulation of EDCs is insufficient.
Post provided by campaign secretariat HEAL and acampaign partner BUND
On 23 July 2013, campaign partner ClientEarth released a report indicating that manufacturers are ignoring, misrepresenting or disregarding the potential of certain EDCs.
The report, REACH registration and endocrine disrupting chemicals, is based on information made available by ECHA about five such chemicals which are used in a wide range of everyday products, including children’s toys and personal care products like sunscreens and deodorants. Industry is undermining European chemical safety with inadequate reporting of information, this is jeopardising the fundamental REACH principle of “no data, no market”.
Since 1999, when the EU Commission first published the Community Strategy for EDCs, there has been a significant increase in the scientific knowledge about these chemicals, but those responsible for ensuring the safety of chemicals they place on the EU market have not adequately adapted their approach so that their REACH dossiers reflect this increase.
The research from ClientEarth indicates that, for a number of substances known to have endocrine disrupting properties, the dossiers are not of the quality required by REACH. REACH is intended to protect public health and the environment and companies that register substances in the incorrect way should be held to account.
The five substances investigated in the report are diethyl phthalate, bisphenol A, tetrabromobisphenol A, triclosan and octyl-methoxycinnamate.
Post provided by campaign partner ClientEarth
EFSA’s scientific experts have provisionally concluded that food is the main source of exposure to bisphenol A (BPA) for consumers. BPA is a chemical compound used in food contact materials such as packaging. This is the Authority’s first review of exposure to BPA since 2006 and the first to cover both dietary and non-dietary sources such as thermal paper and dust.
As part of a two-stage process of its full risk assessment, EFSA is seeking feedback on this draft assessment of consumer exposure to BPA. All stakeholders and interested parties can provide their comments from 25 July to 15 September 2013. During a later stage, EFSA will publicly consult on the second part of its draft opinion, focusing on its assessment of the potential human health risks of BPA.
The public consultation is available here
Post provided by the Campaign Secretariat HEAL
On 13 July, the Collegium Ramazzini sent a letter to President Barroso and Commissioners Tajani, Potočnik, and Borg outlining the serious concerns in the international scientific community of an impending decision regarding EU Chemicals Policy, specifically regarding EDCs.
The Collegium Ramazzini, which is an international academy of 180 scientists from 35 countries, experts in environmental and occupational health, released a statement calling for new ways to test chemicals and to revise current approaches to risk management.
Europeans are exposed to EDCs, both natural and synthetic, to an extent that is causing adverse health effects such as testicular and breast cancer, decline in sperm counts, reproductive organ deformities, diabetes and obesity. Recent research suggests that the effects can even be transmitted to future generations.
With regards to the REACH authorisation, the Collegium Ramazzini recommends to improve test protocols and expanded test requirements to allow the identification of EDCs, for which a safe threshold cannot be determined at present. The scope of REACH should be extended by default to all EDCs and substances of very high concern (SVHC) and stringent hazard-based evaluation criteria must be used for EDCs.
The letter and statement are available on the Collegium Ramazzini website
Post provided by the Campaign Secretariat HEAL
Testing of French and Spanish strawberries showed that 70% of fruits contained pesticides which are EDCs, and two samples even contained a banned pesticide. These results underline the need for an ambitious policy on endocrine disruptors.
Campaign partners Générations Futures and Pesticide Action Network Europe (PAN-E) conducted an investigation into strawberries sold in France, originating from the country or from Spain. Out of 49 samples analysed, 91.83% contained one or more pesticide residues and in total, 71.42% of the samples contained pesticides that are EDCs.
Two out of the 26 French samples (i.e. 7.69%) contained endosulfan, an organochlorine insecticide banned in Europe since 2005 and on the list of Persistent Organic Pollutants to be eliminated globally under the Stockholm Convention, convention implemented under the authority of the UN. This analysis is part of an investigation called “EXPERT 2” on banned pesticides and EDCs.
The findings show the ubiquity of many endocrine disrupting pesticides found in our environment leading to a significant exposure of the population. These substances potentially threaten unborn and young children even at low doses. Strawberries are a popular source of fruit, necessary for a healthy diet, and frequently consumed by pregnant women and children, thus preventing exposure should be a priority.
The two organisations are urging policy makers to take immediate and strong measures to reduce human exposure to pesticides and EDCs.
Campaign partner Vivo Sano cooperated with Générations Futures and PAN Europe on the Spanish part of the research. Vivo Sano has sent a complaint to the Consejería de Medio Ambiente de la Junta de Andalucía (Regional environment ministry of Andalucia), and the Ministry of Health.
Full report in French by Generations Futures
Information in Spanish by Vivo Sano: Press release and ArticleVivosano has also promoted it here http://www.vivosano.org/es_ES/Proyectos/Pesticidasyperturbadoresendocrinosenfresas.aspx
Post provided by the Campaign Secretariat HEAL
On 19 June, 27 not-for-profit organisations in France declared the start of their mass mobilisation to coincide with the fifth and final meeting of the stakeholders in the National Strategy on Endocrine Disruptors (SNPE) in France.
The groups published a manifesto and public petition calling on the French government to adopt an ambitious strategy to reduce exposure of populations and ecosystems to EDCs. The signatories comprise a diverse coalition of French civil society groups, including environmental groups, health insurance bodies, patients groups, consumers, unions and women’s groups.
Progress in negotiations within the National Strategy on Endocrine Disruptors (SNPE) in France appears to be stalling or even receding, according to the press release to launch the campaign. Implementation of the labelling requirement from the existing law on bisphenol A in food packaging does not seem to be taking place, and the anticipated measures on phthalates, which was promised by the environment minister Delphine Batho, has not happened.
In recent months, two important statements from scientific experts have urged action on EDCs to protect public health. In May, the world’s leading experts published the Berlaymont Declaration, which pointed to the high or increasing levels of endocrine-related conditions in Europe. (4) This month, 180 leading scientists at the Collegium Ramazzini published their statement urging action on EDCs. Equally or more important was the publication of the recent joint report by the WHO and UNEP on EDCs. Although the WHO is traditionally cautious on scientific issues in which there is controversy, it has deemed EDCs a global threat which need to be resolved.
The manifesto is available here
The public petitions are available here
Post provided by the Campaign Secretariat HEAL and Campaign Partner Réseau Environnement Santé